![]() ![]() I’d appreciate any feedback you’d be willing to share. It’s located about 5’ from the audio equipment. I suspect the difference may be because I’m using a Mac Mini as the Control connected to the system. An iPad Pro or iPhone are used as controls also. All are feeding a CA200 control amp out to Burchardt Signature S400 speakers. As a control source I’m playing the same piece of music on an older Technics turntable. ![]() Both connect via USB to a Schiit Eitr feeding a MHDT Labs Orchid NOS DAC. Audirvana is running on a 2018 MacBook Air. I don’t experience drop outs or any other transport issues. Roon Control is running on a 2012 Mac Mini, SSD, located in same room as audio stack, connected wireless to the network via a Ruckus R710 access point located 20’ from Mac Mini. The Roon core server is running on a 2019 Mac Mini in my office, wired into home network, SSD & lots of ram. The Roon UI is spectacular in comparison but I want better sound. I need some experienced feedback on what might be the reason for such a difference in SQ. Audirvana is unquestionably to my ears, even with significant tinnitus, a fuller, more forward, more engaging SQ. There hasn’t been any definitive reasons posted for the difference in SQ between Roon and Audirvana. ![]() I’ve read as many posts here as I could find. Have been testing and comparing the SQ against Audirvana. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |